| EndCoronavirus.org |
Another interesting consideration is that data has shown that most people were limiting their movements prior to their state implementing an official "lockdown," meaning they already saw what was happening and made their own decision to stay home, the states merely codified it. If businesses "reopen," I think chances are very slim that most people will be patronizing them as they had been before. So reopening things probably won't change much for the economy, but will lead to more people being exposed and becoming sick because if their employer is open, they won't have a choice about staying home. (I've also seen a lot of people in favor of reopening saying things like, "Of course we'll still continue protecting the elderly and at risk." How will that determination be made? Will less healthy people be given doctors' notes and permission to stay home and receive pay or unemployment compensation? How about people who live with someone who is at risk? What about people who can't go back to work without childcare, in areas where schools are closed and camps have been cancelled?)
I'm now imagining a scenario where most of the world gets things under control, while the US becomes this wasteland nobody wants to travel to (or accept travelers from) or do business with, because the virus is running rampant. There's been lots of exciting news in the last few days about promising developments in treatments and vaccines, but I still maintain that the most effective thing we can do for now, and probably for a long time to come, is just remove human hosts from the virus' reach.
No comments:
Post a Comment